Values in life

-

Apa ayng sudah di semboyangkan?

 Key: There were two keys in which most conversation was conducted. The business key was official and by the rules (Roberts Rules of Order). The joking parts were light and friendly.
Instrument: We met face to face. Notes of the meeting were taken by the recording secretary and would be referred to in subsequent meetings as minutes. An agenda was also used.
Norms: There were many norms within these board meetings. One stated norm was to "be on time." However, there was a competing norm that people within this community engage in activities on what they call, "Puerto Rican time." This sense of time is more fluid and could be any time within a larger range. These competing norms both seemed to be used by different participants and it sometimes made conducting official business difficult.  For example, when someone arrived at a meeting late, the other participants would account for this action by saying, "she's on Puerto Rican time."
Genre: There was a genre that’s called relajo in Spanish. It’s a form of joking that plays with the idea of respect (or respeto). For example, one time a couple of board members were joking about calling the President of the board, your highness or "oh great one." This type of joking was making fun of the very real role distinctions that are made between participants and that one role is deserving of more respect.
Usefulness of S.P.E.A.K.I.N.G. analysis
Once all of these areas have been discovered, you will be more likely to be able to communicate appropriately in a cross-cultural situation. For instance, in a board meeting you might not fault individuals for being late if you knew they were operating on "Puerto Rican time." Likewise, by knowing that the use of titles is expected, you would not fall into the trap of being disrespectful by calling everyone by first name.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dell Hymes's SPEAKING Model

-
Image
Background Sociolinguist  Dell Hymes  developed the following model to promote the analysis of discourse as a series of speech events and speech acts within a cultural context. It uses the first letters of terms for speech components; the categories are so productive and powerful in analysis that you can use this model to analyze many different kinds of discourse. Mr. McGowan patricularly enjoys applying this model to storytelling. The SPEAKING Model S etting and Scene "Setting refers to the time and place of a speech act and, in general, to the physical circumstances" ( Hymes  55).The living room in the grandparents' home might be a setting for a family story. Scene is the "psychological setting" or "cultural definition" of a scene, including characteristics such as range of formality and sense of play or seriousness (Hymes 55-56). The family story may be told at a reunion celebrating the grandparents' anniversary. At times, the family
Read more

A Sample Study Using the S.P.E.A.K.I.N.G. Model

-
Image
A Sample Study Using the S.P.E.A.K.I.N.G. Model Here is an example of one study that was conducted at a Puerto Rican Center (PRC) that was based on Hymes’ model ( Within one communicative event, PRC board meetings there were: S etting : The setting was an old Victorian-type building, third floor, in the Director’s office. A table was in the front of the room with folding chairs around it. Further in the room was the Director’s desk. Pictures and plaques covered the walls and there was a clock on the wall near the door. The scene was the first Thursday of every month, the board of Directors of this non-profit cultural center were assembled to meet for one hour in the early morning to discuss and, when necessary, to vote on matters of importance to the functioning of the Center. P articipants : The potential participants for these meetings were the 13 board members, the staff, consultants, special invited guests and the public at large. The actual participants at each meeting va
Read more

Peaking

-
Dear All, Today, I would like to discuss with you famous anthropologist and linguist Dell Hymes’ SPEAKING model (1974). According to Hymes, a speech situation can only be understood if not only linguistic, but also other aspects are taken into consideration, such as: the setting of the communication, its goals, and the information about the participants. In order to reflect all these factors and help speech act analysts to make more in-depth analysis, Hymes coined the following acronym: SPEAKING [model/paradigm]. Below is the explanation of how to decode it: S= SETTING/SCENE  – i.e. where the speech situation is taking place (e.g. a University lecture hall) – this is the setting; the overall mood and context (is the conversation serious or funny; what is the cultural ambiance) – this is the scene [aka psychological setting]. P= PARTICIPANTS  – i.e. the information about the participants (e.g. their cultural and sociolinguistic background). E= ENDS  (goals) – i.e. what are the g
Read more